Scoring Essay Questions
There are THREE types of Essay Scoring
Analytical:
Primary Trait:
Holistic:
Analytical Scoring
Example of Analytical Scoring Scheme
5. List three advantages of written reponse questions. (3 marks)
answer key: 1 mark each for any 3 of:
- no guessing
- faster to write
- reduce lead time
- more efficient if small class & teaching only once (half mark for "small class" or "only teaching once")
- rich in diagnostic information
|
|
Primary Trait Scoring
PREMISE: All written communication serves different and identifiable purposes
- postcard = friendliness, humour, description of events
- instructions = clarity, organization, usefulness of examples
- Grade 9 Achievement test, letter to mayor, primary trait was persuasiveness
- highly persuasive, fairly persuasive, unpersuasive
Example of Primary Trait Scoring
5. Write a letter to the editor of the ATA magazine advocating greater emphasis on the arts in the Alberta curriculum. (3 marks)
answer key:
- POOR: NOT PERSUASIVE
attempt is made to answer, but position is hard to determine or is completely unpersuasive
- ACCEPTABLE: PERSUASIVE
a position is stated, and supported with one or two adequate arguments
- SUPERIOR: VERY PERSUASIVE
a position is stated, and supported with three or more strong arguments
|
|
Holisitic Scoring
- most appropriate for longer essays
- based on overall impression, not point by point
- don't separate out each element
(A) Think of it as sorting into bins
- high, medium and low
or high, extra high, medium, low, and really dreadful
- can't be much finer than 5 divisions -- 6 at most
but Alberta Education uses 5 mostly, so might as well get used to that
- have to re-read everything to ensure that all the papers in 5 piles roughly the same; all in middle pile roughly the same, and less good than top pile;
- official version, don't mark these papers because circling spelling mistakes distracts you from overall impression
--but then, what about feed back? Grade first, then mark?
--re-reading....
(B) Another version is simply to rank from top to bottom on endless continuum
- bit problematic if paper is good in one aspect, weak in another
WRONG WAY TO DO IT:
- as new teacher not sure of the standard you should be expecting from students, you will be tempted to take work of your best student and USE IT AS THE ANSWER KEY, start up here and mark down;
or even worse, take work of your worst student, and mark up
WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT?
- well, if you've already decided who's the best, what's the point of marking?
--poor student that you've decided is the worst is stuck there BY DEFINITION
Holistic is more efficient than analytical if relatively few students in class
-- fewer questions to design
-- fewer marking schemes -- have one generic
And then there's Alberta Education's version
GRADE 12 DIPLOMA SCALE (OVERHEAD)
- holistic, but on four scales
- to control for spelling, etc
- to make sure values got covered, control coverage
- note that descriptors describe what we actually found to be typical of papers
at this level
And then there's My Scoring Scheme